arraystar lncrna microarray Search Results


90
KangChen Inc arraystar human lncrna microarray v3.0
Arraystar Human Lncrna Microarray V3.0, supplied by KangChen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/arraystar human lncrna microarray v3.0/product/KangChen Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arraystar human lncrna microarray v3.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human lncrna array v2.0
Human Lncrna Array V2.0, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human lncrna array v2.0/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lncrna array v2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc m6a mrna&lncrna epitranscriptomic microarray 8×60k
Density of UG nucleotide sequences 100bp upstream and downstream of <t>m6A</t> modifications identified by cross-linking induced mutation sites (CIMS; A ) or cross-linking induced truncation sites (CITS; B ) in relation to random sequences (red line). Grey shading represents 95% confidence regions. ( C ) Schematic of HaloTag immunoprecipitation and dot blot procedure. ( D ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of HaloTag-labeled proteins in HEK293T cells overexpressing HaloTag, TDP43-HaloTag or YTHDF2-HaloTag from 3 biological replicates. ( E ) Diagram illustrating insertion of the HaloTag open reading frame into the endogenous TARDBP locus immediately 5’ to the TDP43 start codon, resulting in a fusion of HaloTag to the N-terminus of TDP43. ( F ) Halo-TDP43 HEK293T cells labeled live with JF646 Halo dye (red), then fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained with anti-TDP43 antibody (green) prior to imaging. DAPI (blue) marks the nucleus of each cell. Scale bar = 10µm. ( G ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of endogenous HaloTag-TDP43 or exogenous HaloTag. Additional replicates shown in Sup. Fig. 1.
M6a Mrna&Lncrna Epitranscriptomic Microarray 8×60k, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m6a mrna&lncrna epitranscriptomic microarray 8×60k/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m6a mrna&lncrna epitranscriptomic microarray 8×60k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human se-lncrnas microarray
SE‐LncRNA <t>microarray</t> analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed <t>SE‐LncRNAs</t> (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively
Human Se Lncrnas Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human se-lncrnas microarray/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human se-lncrnas microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc mouse lncrna v2.0
SE‐LncRNA <t>microarray</t> analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed <t>SE‐LncRNAs</t> (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively
Mouse Lncrna V2.0, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse lncrna v2.0/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse lncrna v2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc rat lncrna array
SE‐LncRNA <t>microarray</t> analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed <t>SE‐LncRNAs</t> (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively
Rat Lncrna Array, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat lncrna array/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat lncrna array - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc microarray targeting 7419 lncrnas
SE‐LncRNA <t>microarray</t> analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed <t>SE‐LncRNAs</t> (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively
Microarray Targeting 7419 Lncrnas, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray targeting 7419 lncrnas/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray targeting 7419 lncrnas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human super-enhancer lncrna microarray (8 × 15 k)
SE‐LncRNA <t>microarray</t> analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed <t>SE‐LncRNAs</t> (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively
Human Super Enhancer Lncrna Microarray (8 × 15 K), supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human super-enhancer lncrna microarray (8 × 15 k)/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human super-enhancer lncrna microarray (8 × 15 k) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc lncrna expression microarray
Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) <t>lncRNA</t> expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by <t>microarray</t> analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.
Lncrna Expression Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lncrna expression microarray/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lncrna expression microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc 8 60 k arraystar mouse lncrna microarray v2.0
Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) <t>lncRNA</t> expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by <t>microarray</t> analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.
8 60 K Arraystar Mouse Lncrna Microarray V2.0, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/8 60 k arraystar mouse lncrna microarray v2.0/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
8 60 k arraystar mouse lncrna microarray v2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc microarray-based mrna/lncrna methylation analysis
Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) <t>lncRNA</t> expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by <t>microarray</t> analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.
Microarray Based Mrna/Lncrna Methylation Analysis, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray-based mrna/lncrna methylation analysis/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray-based mrna/lncrna methylation analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc lncrna m6a epitranscriptomic microarray (8 × 60 k
Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) <t>lncRNA</t> expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by <t>microarray</t> analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.
Lncrna M6a Epitranscriptomic Microarray (8 × 60 K, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lncrna m6a epitranscriptomic microarray (8 × 60 k/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lncrna m6a epitranscriptomic microarray (8 × 60 k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Density of UG nucleotide sequences 100bp upstream and downstream of m6A modifications identified by cross-linking induced mutation sites (CIMS; A ) or cross-linking induced truncation sites (CITS; B ) in relation to random sequences (red line). Grey shading represents 95% confidence regions. ( C ) Schematic of HaloTag immunoprecipitation and dot blot procedure. ( D ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of HaloTag-labeled proteins in HEK293T cells overexpressing HaloTag, TDP43-HaloTag or YTHDF2-HaloTag from 3 biological replicates. ( E ) Diagram illustrating insertion of the HaloTag open reading frame into the endogenous TARDBP locus immediately 5’ to the TDP43 start codon, resulting in a fusion of HaloTag to the N-terminus of TDP43. ( F ) Halo-TDP43 HEK293T cells labeled live with JF646 Halo dye (red), then fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained with anti-TDP43 antibody (green) prior to imaging. DAPI (blue) marks the nucleus of each cell. Scale bar = 10µm. ( G ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of endogenous HaloTag-TDP43 or exogenous HaloTag. Additional replicates shown in Sup. Fig. 1.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

doi: 10.1101/2022.04.03.486880

Figure Lengend Snippet: Density of UG nucleotide sequences 100bp upstream and downstream of m6A modifications identified by cross-linking induced mutation sites (CIMS; A ) or cross-linking induced truncation sites (CITS; B ) in relation to random sequences (red line). Grey shading represents 95% confidence regions. ( C ) Schematic of HaloTag immunoprecipitation and dot blot procedure. ( D ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of HaloTag-labeled proteins in HEK293T cells overexpressing HaloTag, TDP43-HaloTag or YTHDF2-HaloTag from 3 biological replicates. ( E ) Diagram illustrating insertion of the HaloTag open reading frame into the endogenous TARDBP locus immediately 5’ to the TDP43 start codon, resulting in a fusion of HaloTag to the N-terminus of TDP43. ( F ) Halo-TDP43 HEK293T cells labeled live with JF646 Halo dye (red), then fixed, permeabilized, and immunostained with anti-TDP43 antibody (green) prior to imaging. DAPI (blue) marks the nucleus of each cell. Scale bar = 10µm. ( G ) Dot blot for total RNA (detected by methylene blue) or m6A-modified RNA (detected by anti-m6A antibody) isolated by immunoaffinity purification of endogenous HaloTag-TDP43 or exogenous HaloTag. Additional replicates shown in Sup. Fig. 1.

Article Snippet: Human spinal cord samples were homogenized in Trizol and RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction for the m6A mRNA&lncRNA Epitranscriptomic microarray (8×60K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Immunoprecipitation, Dot Blot, Modification, Isolation, Immunoaffinity Purification, Labeling, Imaging

( A ) HaloTag-TDP43 immunoprecipitation was followed by DART-seq to delineate m6A sites within TDP43 target RNAs. HaloTag-TDP43 HEK293T cells were transfected with APOBEC1-YTH or APOBEC1-YTHmut and crosslinked before immunoaffinity purification of HaloTag-labeled proteins. Immunoprecipitated RNAs were then sequenced and C-T transitions were identified in the context of DRACH motifs (red shaded box, D=A/G/T, R=A/G, H=A/C/T). Absolute counts ( B ) and relative frequency ( C ) of base pair transitions observed by RNA-seq in each condition. Shaded boxes represent transition types expected from APOBEC1 activity. ( D ) Example m6A sites identified by DART-seq in RPL10A . C-T transitions are highlighted in red, and DRACH motifs in pink. Green arrow, transcription start site; red hexagon, transcription stop site; thick blue bars, coding exons; thin blue bars, untranslated region. ( E ) Absolute count and relative distribution ( F ) of DART-seq reads in cells expressing APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC1-YTHmut. UTR, untranslated region; CDS, coding sequence. ( G ) Scatter plot of TDP43 targets, determined by fold enrichment in precipitated RNA from HaloTag-TDP43 cells (expressing APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC10YTHmut) compared to cells transfected with HaloTag. Red dots signify transcripts showing > 2-fold enrichment in both APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC1-YTHmut expressing cells. TARDBP , yellow dot, identified as high confidence target. ( H ) Stacked bar graph showing percentage of m6A modified RNA in TDP43 targets (red) and non-targets (black). ( I ) Cumulative distribution of RNA methylation in TDP43 targets (red) and non-targets (black). p = 1.87×10 −55 by Kolmogorov Smirnov test. ( J ) Euler diagram depicting overlap between TDP43 targets identified in this study, and those identified by TDP43 cross linking and immunoprecipitation followed by RNA-sequencing (CLIP-seq) in HEK293T cells (Hallegger et al ., 2021) . **p=1.5×10 −117 , hypergeometric test. ( K ) Pie charts demonstrating the percentage of methylated RNA among TDP43 targets (pink) and non-targets (grey). **p<1×10 −5 chi-square test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

doi: 10.1101/2022.04.03.486880

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) HaloTag-TDP43 immunoprecipitation was followed by DART-seq to delineate m6A sites within TDP43 target RNAs. HaloTag-TDP43 HEK293T cells were transfected with APOBEC1-YTH or APOBEC1-YTHmut and crosslinked before immunoaffinity purification of HaloTag-labeled proteins. Immunoprecipitated RNAs were then sequenced and C-T transitions were identified in the context of DRACH motifs (red shaded box, D=A/G/T, R=A/G, H=A/C/T). Absolute counts ( B ) and relative frequency ( C ) of base pair transitions observed by RNA-seq in each condition. Shaded boxes represent transition types expected from APOBEC1 activity. ( D ) Example m6A sites identified by DART-seq in RPL10A . C-T transitions are highlighted in red, and DRACH motifs in pink. Green arrow, transcription start site; red hexagon, transcription stop site; thick blue bars, coding exons; thin blue bars, untranslated region. ( E ) Absolute count and relative distribution ( F ) of DART-seq reads in cells expressing APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC1-YTHmut. UTR, untranslated region; CDS, coding sequence. ( G ) Scatter plot of TDP43 targets, determined by fold enrichment in precipitated RNA from HaloTag-TDP43 cells (expressing APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC10YTHmut) compared to cells transfected with HaloTag. Red dots signify transcripts showing > 2-fold enrichment in both APOBEC1-YTH and APOBEC1-YTHmut expressing cells. TARDBP , yellow dot, identified as high confidence target. ( H ) Stacked bar graph showing percentage of m6A modified RNA in TDP43 targets (red) and non-targets (black). ( I ) Cumulative distribution of RNA methylation in TDP43 targets (red) and non-targets (black). p = 1.87×10 −55 by Kolmogorov Smirnov test. ( J ) Euler diagram depicting overlap between TDP43 targets identified in this study, and those identified by TDP43 cross linking and immunoprecipitation followed by RNA-sequencing (CLIP-seq) in HEK293T cells (Hallegger et al ., 2021) . **p=1.5×10 −117 , hypergeometric test. ( K ) Pie charts demonstrating the percentage of methylated RNA among TDP43 targets (pink) and non-targets (grey). **p<1×10 −5 chi-square test.

Article Snippet: Human spinal cord samples were homogenized in Trizol and RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction for the m6A mRNA&lncRNA Epitranscriptomic microarray (8×60K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Immunoaffinity Purification, Labeling, RNA Sequencing, Activity Assay, Expressing, Sequencing, Modification, Methylation

( A ) TARDBP gene map, illustrating TDP43 binding region (TBR), the location of the DRACH motif (pink square), and the C-T transition (red box) identified by DART-seq within this domain, representing an m6A site. ( B ) Schematic of the TARDBP minigene reporter, consisting of the mCherry ORF upstream of TARDBP exon 6 and 3.4 Kb of the TARDBP 3’ UTR. The A residue adjacent to the detected C-T transition via DART-seq in the WT reporter (mCherry-TBR) was mutated to a G, precluding methylation the mutant reporter (mCherry-mTBR). Red, methylated residue; blue line, DRACH motif; dagger, C-T transition from DART-seq. ( C ) HaloTag-TDP43 was isolated by immunoaffinity purification from HaloTag-TDP43 HEK293T cells expressing mCherry-TBR or mCherry-mTBR, and reporter RNA detected in elution fractions by qRT-PCR. ( D ) Outline of TDP43 autoregulation assay. Excess TDP43 binds to the reporter, triggering reporter splicing, destabilization, and reduced mCherry fluorescence. ( E ) Primary rodent neurons were transfected with WT (mCherry-TBR) or mutant (mCherry-mTBR) reporters, together with EGFP or TDP43-EGFP. After 7d, mCherry expression was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar= 20 µm. Normalized RFP (mCherry) intensity in primary neurons expressing WT mCherry-TBR reporter ( F ) or mutant mCherry-mTBR ( G ) reporter together with EGFP or TDP43(WT)-EGFP. Cherry-TBR+GFP n= 160, Cherry-TBR+TDP43(WT)-GFP n= 58, Cherry-mTBR+GFP n= 105, Cherry-mTBR+TDP43(WT)-GFP n= 44. Data in C plotted as mean ± SD, collected from 3 biological replicates. ns= not significant, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Data in F and G plotted as mean ± SD, color coded by biological replicate. ns = not significant, *p < 0.05; Welch’s t-test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

doi: 10.1101/2022.04.03.486880

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) TARDBP gene map, illustrating TDP43 binding region (TBR), the location of the DRACH motif (pink square), and the C-T transition (red box) identified by DART-seq within this domain, representing an m6A site. ( B ) Schematic of the TARDBP minigene reporter, consisting of the mCherry ORF upstream of TARDBP exon 6 and 3.4 Kb of the TARDBP 3’ UTR. The A residue adjacent to the detected C-T transition via DART-seq in the WT reporter (mCherry-TBR) was mutated to a G, precluding methylation the mutant reporter (mCherry-mTBR). Red, methylated residue; blue line, DRACH motif; dagger, C-T transition from DART-seq. ( C ) HaloTag-TDP43 was isolated by immunoaffinity purification from HaloTag-TDP43 HEK293T cells expressing mCherry-TBR or mCherry-mTBR, and reporter RNA detected in elution fractions by qRT-PCR. ( D ) Outline of TDP43 autoregulation assay. Excess TDP43 binds to the reporter, triggering reporter splicing, destabilization, and reduced mCherry fluorescence. ( E ) Primary rodent neurons were transfected with WT (mCherry-TBR) or mutant (mCherry-mTBR) reporters, together with EGFP or TDP43-EGFP. After 7d, mCherry expression was assessed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar= 20 µm. Normalized RFP (mCherry) intensity in primary neurons expressing WT mCherry-TBR reporter ( F ) or mutant mCherry-mTBR ( G ) reporter together with EGFP or TDP43(WT)-EGFP. Cherry-TBR+GFP n= 160, Cherry-TBR+TDP43(WT)-GFP n= 58, Cherry-mTBR+GFP n= 105, Cherry-mTBR+TDP43(WT)-GFP n= 44. Data in C plotted as mean ± SD, collected from 3 biological replicates. ns= not significant, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. Data in F and G plotted as mean ± SD, color coded by biological replicate. ns = not significant, *p < 0.05; Welch’s t-test.

Article Snippet: Human spinal cord samples were homogenized in Trizol and RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction for the m6A mRNA&lncRNA Epitranscriptomic microarray (8×60K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Residue, Methylation, Mutagenesis, Isolation, Immunoaffinity Purification, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Fluorescence, Transfection, Microscopy

( A ) Genome-wide analysis of RNA methylation via epitranscriptomic array. RNA was extracted from control (n= 3) and sporadic ALS (sALS) patient (n= 4) spinal cord samples, prior to m6A RNA immunoprecipitation. The resulting samples were separated into methylated and non-methylated RNA, then labeled with distinct fluorescent dyes (red and green stars) prior to hybridization, allowing relative quantification of methylation at each annotated locus. ( B ) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot comparing methylation levels of control (grey) and ALS (red) patient samples. ( C ) Hierarchical clustering of mRNA methylation profiles from control and ALS mRNA samples. ( D ) Volcano plot depicting fold change in mRNA methylation levels in ALS compared to control spinal cord. ( E ) Hierarchical clustering of lncRNA methylation profiles from control ALS lncRNA samples. ( F ) Volcano plot showing fold change in lncRNA methylation levels in ALS compared to control spinal cord. In D and F , grey horizontal vertical lines represent p= 0.05 and fold change (FC)= 2. ( G ) Euler diagram demonstrating overlap (n= 322, p= 5.09×10 −119 , hypergeometric test) among TDP43 substrates and methylated transcripts identified in HEK293T cells, in additional to hypermethylated transcripts determined via m6A array in sALS spinal cord. Comparisons were limited to the subset of transcripts expressed in both HEK293T cells and human spinal cord (nTPM>2). ( H ) Based on comparisons with the GEO transcription factor loss-of-function database via Enrichr , there was strong enrichment for TDP43-regulated genes not only among the set of 2034 transcripts hypermethylated in sALS spinal cord, but also among the 322 TDP43 targets that were also hypermethylated in sALS (A1 in G ). Combined score = (log 10 p * Z-score). ( I ) Immunohistochemical staining for m6A in control and sALS spinal cord sections. Scale bars= 50 µm. ( J ) Quantification of m6A antibody reactivity in spinal cord neurons from control (n= 110 neurons) and sALS (n= 277 neurons) sections. Plot shows mean +/- SD, color coded by patient. ****p< 0.0001 via Mann-Whitney test.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

doi: 10.1101/2022.04.03.486880

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Genome-wide analysis of RNA methylation via epitranscriptomic array. RNA was extracted from control (n= 3) and sporadic ALS (sALS) patient (n= 4) spinal cord samples, prior to m6A RNA immunoprecipitation. The resulting samples were separated into methylated and non-methylated RNA, then labeled with distinct fluorescent dyes (red and green stars) prior to hybridization, allowing relative quantification of methylation at each annotated locus. ( B ) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot comparing methylation levels of control (grey) and ALS (red) patient samples. ( C ) Hierarchical clustering of mRNA methylation profiles from control and ALS mRNA samples. ( D ) Volcano plot depicting fold change in mRNA methylation levels in ALS compared to control spinal cord. ( E ) Hierarchical clustering of lncRNA methylation profiles from control ALS lncRNA samples. ( F ) Volcano plot showing fold change in lncRNA methylation levels in ALS compared to control spinal cord. In D and F , grey horizontal vertical lines represent p= 0.05 and fold change (FC)= 2. ( G ) Euler diagram demonstrating overlap (n= 322, p= 5.09×10 −119 , hypergeometric test) among TDP43 substrates and methylated transcripts identified in HEK293T cells, in additional to hypermethylated transcripts determined via m6A array in sALS spinal cord. Comparisons were limited to the subset of transcripts expressed in both HEK293T cells and human spinal cord (nTPM>2). ( H ) Based on comparisons with the GEO transcription factor loss-of-function database via Enrichr , there was strong enrichment for TDP43-regulated genes not only among the set of 2034 transcripts hypermethylated in sALS spinal cord, but also among the 322 TDP43 targets that were also hypermethylated in sALS (A1 in G ). Combined score = (log 10 p * Z-score). ( I ) Immunohistochemical staining for m6A in control and sALS spinal cord sections. Scale bars= 50 µm. ( J ) Quantification of m6A antibody reactivity in spinal cord neurons from control (n= 110 neurons) and sALS (n= 277 neurons) sections. Plot shows mean +/- SD, color coded by patient. ****p< 0.0001 via Mann-Whitney test.

Article Snippet: Human spinal cord samples were homogenized in Trizol and RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction for the m6A mRNA&lncRNA Epitranscriptomic microarray (8×60K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Genome Wide, Methylation, Control, RNA Immunoprecipitation, Labeling, Hybridization, Quantitative Proteomics, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY

( A ) Representative images of rodent primary neurons transfected with plasmids expressing Cas9-2A-EGFP and sgRNA targeting the neuronal protein NeuN or negative control (LacZ). 5d after transfection, neurons were fixed and immunostained for NeuN (red). White dashed circles indicate nucleus stained with Hoechst (blue). ( B ) NeuN antibody reactivity measured in EGFP-positive neurons expressing sgLacZ (n= 565) or sgNeuN (n= 654), ****p < 0.0001 by Mann-Whitney. ( C ) Schematic depicting m6A writers (green), erasers (red), and readers (orange) targeted by CRISPR/Cas9. ( D ) Primary neurons expressing EGFP and TDP43-mApple were assessed at regular 24h intervals by fluorescence microscopy, and their survival assessed by automated image analysis. Individual neurons are assigned unique identifiers (yellow number) and tracked until their time of death (red), indicated by cellular dissolution, blebbing, or neurite retraction. Scale bar= 20µm. ( E ) Cumulative hazard plot depicting risk of death for neurons expressing TDP43(WT) + non-targeting (NT) (red line), mApple + NT (grey line), or TDP43(WT) + Atxn2 sgRNA (purple line). †p<2.0 ×10 −16 , Hazard ratio (HR)= 3.45; ***p= 5.81 ×10 −4 , HR= 0.80). ( F ) Forest plot showing HR for TDP43-overexpressing neurons upon knockdown of m6A writers (green), erasers (dark red), and readers (orange), in comparison to nontargeting (NT) control. Dashed line indicates HR= 1, representing the survival of the reference condition, neurons expressing TDP43-mApple and NT sgRNA. Values >1 indicate increased toxicity, whereas values <1 denote relative protection. Error bars represent 95% CI. ( G ) Alkbh5 knockout significantly increases TDP43 associated toxicity. †p=3.11 ×10 −5 , HR= 1.59; ***p= 2.65×10 −11 , HR= 2.03. ( H ) Ythdf2 knockout significantly extends survival in TDP43-expressing neurons. ***p <2.0 ×10 −16 , HR= 1.69; †p= 6.2 ×10 −6 , HR= 0.71. ( I ) YTHDF2 overexpression is toxic to neurons. ***p= 3.07×10 −5 , HR= 1.30. ( J ) METTL3/14 overexpression enhances TDP43-dependent toxicity in neurons. †p = 5.53 ×10 −4 , HR= 1.32; ***p =4.16 ×10 −6 , HR= 1.31. p values in E, G-J determined via Cox proportional hazards analysis, with a minimum 3 of biological replicates.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: RNA methylation influences TDP43 binding and disease pathogenesis in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia

doi: 10.1101/2022.04.03.486880

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Representative images of rodent primary neurons transfected with plasmids expressing Cas9-2A-EGFP and sgRNA targeting the neuronal protein NeuN or negative control (LacZ). 5d after transfection, neurons were fixed and immunostained for NeuN (red). White dashed circles indicate nucleus stained with Hoechst (blue). ( B ) NeuN antibody reactivity measured in EGFP-positive neurons expressing sgLacZ (n= 565) or sgNeuN (n= 654), ****p < 0.0001 by Mann-Whitney. ( C ) Schematic depicting m6A writers (green), erasers (red), and readers (orange) targeted by CRISPR/Cas9. ( D ) Primary neurons expressing EGFP and TDP43-mApple were assessed at regular 24h intervals by fluorescence microscopy, and their survival assessed by automated image analysis. Individual neurons are assigned unique identifiers (yellow number) and tracked until their time of death (red), indicated by cellular dissolution, blebbing, or neurite retraction. Scale bar= 20µm. ( E ) Cumulative hazard plot depicting risk of death for neurons expressing TDP43(WT) + non-targeting (NT) (red line), mApple + NT (grey line), or TDP43(WT) + Atxn2 sgRNA (purple line). †p<2.0 ×10 −16 , Hazard ratio (HR)= 3.45; ***p= 5.81 ×10 −4 , HR= 0.80). ( F ) Forest plot showing HR for TDP43-overexpressing neurons upon knockdown of m6A writers (green), erasers (dark red), and readers (orange), in comparison to nontargeting (NT) control. Dashed line indicates HR= 1, representing the survival of the reference condition, neurons expressing TDP43-mApple and NT sgRNA. Values >1 indicate increased toxicity, whereas values <1 denote relative protection. Error bars represent 95% CI. ( G ) Alkbh5 knockout significantly increases TDP43 associated toxicity. †p=3.11 ×10 −5 , HR= 1.59; ***p= 2.65×10 −11 , HR= 2.03. ( H ) Ythdf2 knockout significantly extends survival in TDP43-expressing neurons. ***p <2.0 ×10 −16 , HR= 1.69; †p= 6.2 ×10 −6 , HR= 0.71. ( I ) YTHDF2 overexpression is toxic to neurons. ***p= 3.07×10 −5 , HR= 1.30. ( J ) METTL3/14 overexpression enhances TDP43-dependent toxicity in neurons. †p = 5.53 ×10 −4 , HR= 1.32; ***p =4.16 ×10 −6 , HR= 1.31. p values in E, G-J determined via Cox proportional hazards analysis, with a minimum 3 of biological replicates.

Article Snippet: Human spinal cord samples were homogenized in Trizol and RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction for the m6A mRNA&lncRNA Epitranscriptomic microarray (8×60K, Arraystar, Rockville, MD, USA).

Techniques: Transfection, Expressing, Negative Control, Staining, MANN-WHITNEY, CRISPR, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Dissolution, Knockdown, Comparison, Control, Knock-Out, Over Expression

SE‐LncRNA microarray analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed SE‐LncRNAs (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively

Journal: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis

Article Title: Super‐enhancer–associated long noncoding RNA RP11‐569A11.1 inhibited cell progression and metastasis by regulating IFIT2 in colorectal cancer

doi: 10.1002/jcla.23780

Figure Lengend Snippet: SE‐LncRNA microarray analysis of CRC tissues. A, The scatter plot displayed variation in SE‐LncRNA expression between group‐N (normal) and group‐T (CRC). B, The volcano plot represented the fold change values and P‐values of the microarray data. C, Hierarchical clustering revealed differentially expressed SE‐LncRNAs (fold change >2, p ‐value <0.05). Red and green colors represented upregulated and downregulated SE‐LncRNAs, respectively

Article Snippet: Given that the expression abundance of SE‐LncRNA at lower levels than that of mRNA, and RNA‐seq is not sensitive to low‐abundance SE‐LncRNAs, we conducted Arraystar human SE‐LncRNAs microarray to detect differentially expressed SE‐LncRNAs.

Techniques: Microarray, Expressing

Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) lncRNA expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by microarray analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.

Journal: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Article Title: Down-Regulation of Lnc-CYP7A1-1 Rejuvenates Aged Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Improve Their Efficacy for Heart Repair Through SYNE1

doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.600304

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression profile of lncRNAs in young and old hBM-MSCs. (A) lncRNA expression in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by microarray analysis. (B) Differential lncRNA expression was validated by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; ∗ P < 0.05 O vs. Y.

Article Snippet: Total RNA was isolated from hBM-MSCs after cultured in hypoxic conditions for 72 h. 12 × 135K lncRNA Expression Microarray (Arraystar, Rockville, MD, United States) was used to detected hBM-MSCs cDNA.

Techniques: Expressing, Microarray

The expression of SYNE1 was inhibited by lnc-CYP7A1-1. (A) Gene co-expression networks were built to detect the interactions among lncRNAs and genes. Red color indicates expression up-regulated and green color indicates expression down-regulated. The dots represents genes and the diamond represents lncRNAs. (B) The expression of SYNE1 in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by microarray analysis. (C) The expression of SYNE1 in Old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was compared by real-time qPCR. (D) Old (O) hBM-MSCs were transfected by inhibition lentivirus (O-sh-CYP7A1) or control lentivirus (O-c), respectively. The expression of SYNE1 was compared by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; * P < 0.05 O vs. Y, O-c vs. O-sh-CYP7A1.

Journal: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Article Title: Down-Regulation of Lnc-CYP7A1-1 Rejuvenates Aged Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Improve Their Efficacy for Heart Repair Through SYNE1

doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.600304

Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of SYNE1 was inhibited by lnc-CYP7A1-1. (A) Gene co-expression networks were built to detect the interactions among lncRNAs and genes. Red color indicates expression up-regulated and green color indicates expression down-regulated. The dots represents genes and the diamond represents lncRNAs. (B) The expression of SYNE1 in old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was determined by microarray analysis. (C) The expression of SYNE1 in Old (O) and young (Y) hBM-MSCs was compared by real-time qPCR. (D) Old (O) hBM-MSCs were transfected by inhibition lentivirus (O-sh-CYP7A1) or control lentivirus (O-c), respectively. The expression of SYNE1 was compared by real-time qPCR. n = 5/group; * P < 0.05 O vs. Y, O-c vs. O-sh-CYP7A1.

Article Snippet: Total RNA was isolated from hBM-MSCs after cultured in hypoxic conditions for 72 h. 12 × 135K lncRNA Expression Microarray (Arraystar, Rockville, MD, United States) was used to detected hBM-MSCs cDNA.

Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, Transfection, Inhibition, Control